Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: Abhishek Kumar Paroha, Deepak Kumar Bandewar
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.45471
Certificate: View Certificate
This study draws attention on proper planning and construction practices for multi-storied buildings on sloping ground. However, in usual design practice the designers generally ignore the behavior of the building due to the effect of sloping ground. The evaluation of a G+4 storey RCC structure on varying sloping angles (00, 150, 200, 250, 300 and 400) were studied and also compared with the flat surface. The evaluations of the structure were carried by the software STAAD Pro v8i to study the effect of slopes on building performance. The evaluation was done to figure out the effect of sloping ground on the forces applied on the structure. Soil interaction must be suitably believed from design point of view. The Research work tries to find the truth about the earthquake-related behavior of multi storey structures on sloping angles thinking about soil-structure interaction. The horizontal reactions, bending moment in footings and axial force, bending moment in columns were critically studied to put the effects of different sloping ground. It has been followed that the footing columns of lower height attract more forces, because of a big increase in their stiffness, which in turn increases the horizontal forces and bending moment. So, the section of these columns should be designed for changed forces due to the effect of sloping ground. It draws attention to the need for proper analysis and designing of the structure resting on sloping surface. Overall movement of the structure with respect to different sloping ground setups is also carefully studied.
I. INTRODUCTION
A. General
Now days, expressive constructions were taking place in hilly areas due to lack of plain ground. As a result, the mountain areas have marked effect on the buildings in terms of style, material and method of construction leading to lot of structures in hilly areas. Due to sloping profile, the different levels of such structures step back towards the hill slope and may also have setback also at the same time. These structures become highly uneven and unsymmetrical, due to different version in mass and stiffness distributions on different upwards and downwards axis at each floor. Such construction in seismic prone areas attracts greater shear forces and torsion compared to usual construction.
A lack of plain ground in hilly area forces the construction activity on sloping ground. Slope construction of buildings built in masonry with mud mortar/cement mortar without going along with earthquake codal provisions and analysis of wind have proved unsafe and, resulted in loss of life and property when subjected to earthquake ground movements and neglecting the winds which flows at upper part of the hills. Hilly areas are more prone in earthquake and wind activity for e.g. Northern area of India.
In some parts of world, mountain area were more likely to get earthquakes; e.g. northeast area of India. In this hilly areas, usually material like, the clay, brick, stone masonry and dressed stone masonry, timber reinforced concrete, bamboo, etc., which is locally available, is used for the construction of houses. The money based growth and rapid growth of the cities with more people in hilly areas has speed up the Real Estate Development. Because of which the population density in the hilly areas has increased hugely. Therefore, there is huge demand for the construction of buildings on hill slope in and around the cities.
Vibrations which causes disturbance in the earth’s surface caused by waves created inside the earth are termed as Seismic vibrations. When an earthquake of certain magnitude forces a structure they cause movements in the structure which depends upon the structures vibrational and the location of structure. If a lightweight flexible building wasbuilt on a foundation which was very stiff, idea is that the input movement at the bottom of the structure is similarto free-field movement.
Structures on hills vary from those on regular plains because they are irregularly horizontal as well as vertical. In north and north-eastern parts of India have large scale of hilly terrain which falls in the category of earthquake zone IV and V.
B. Seismic Behaviour Of Buildings On Slopes In India
In the region where seismic zone were categorized under zone IV and V the construction of multi-storey buildings has a more demand, due to its rapid growth economically. While construction, it must be noted that slope buildings are different from those in regular plain construction i.e., they are exceptionally rare and unsymmetrical in flat and up/down planes, and torsional coupled.
Shillong Plateau seismic tremor (M8.2) of 1897 and the Kangra quake (M7.8) of 1905 was the major of a few pulverizing tremors to happen in northern India. An estimated of more than 375,000 population were killed in epicentral region, and over 100,000 buildings were destroyed by the earthquake. Similarly in recent earthquakes like Bihar-Nepal (1980), Uttarkashi (1990), Sikkim (2011), and Doda (2013) affected many buildings on hill slopes.
A seismic plan of tall structures has accepted extensive significance as of late. Incustomary techniques received in light of basic method of the structure and conveyance of tremor compels as static powers at different stories might be satisfactory for structures of little tallness subjected to quake of low Intensity yet as the quantity of stories expands the seismic plan requests more thorough Amid past tremors, fortified cement (RC) outline structures that have segments of various statures inside one story, endured more harm in the shorter sections when contrasted with taller segments in a similar story.
C. Significance Of Study
Slope structures are not quite the same as those in fields, they are exceptionally unpredictable and unsymmetrical in even and vertical planes, and torsionally coupled. Consequently, they are vulnerable to serious harm. At the point when influenced by tremor ground movement. Past seismic tremors [e.g. Kangra (1905), Bihar-Nepal (1934 and 1980), Assam (1950), Tokachi-Oki-Japan (1968), Uttarkashi-India (1991)], have demonstrated that structures situated close to the edge of extend of slopes or slanting ground endured serious harms. Such are horizontal powers under the activity of seismic tremors. Structures have mass and solidness fluctuating along the vertical and level planes, coming about the focal point of mass and focal point of inflexibility don't agree on different floors. This requires torsional investigation. Little data is accessible in the writing about the investigation of structures on inclining ground. The examination exhibits in this paper gone for anticipate on seismic reaction of RC structures with various setups on inclining and plain ground.
II. METHOD OF ANALYSIS
According to Kani's strategy minutes at the close end of a part will be total of:
a. The settled end minutes at the close end because of this stacking on the part.
b. Twice the turn’s commitment of the close end.
c. The turn commitment of the far end.
Mab = Mab+ Mab+ Mba Mba = Mba+2 Mba+ Mab Where,
Mab = last end minutes at point A. Mba = last end minutes at point B Mab= settled end minutes at A Mba= settled end minutes at B
Mab= revolution commitment of end A
Mba= turn commitment of end B
The parts to which the last end minutes Mab and Mbacan be part up as or Minutes are controlled by experiencing the accompanying stages-
Consequently, the last minutes Mab and Mba can be communicated as conditions-
Mab = Mab+2 Mab+ Mba Mba = M_ba+2 Mba+ Mab
III. METHODOLOGY
This thesis deals with relative study of behavior of sloping ground building frames considering different inclination (00, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300) under earthquake forces. The comparison of sloping ground and plane ground building under seismic forces is done. Here G+ 4storey is taken and same live load is applied in three the buildings for its behavior and comparison.
The framed buildings are subjected to vibrations because of earthquake and therefore seismic analysis is essential for these building frames. The rigid system is determined by applying in five building frames in seismic intensities: V with the help of STAAD Pro.
A. STAAD Pro. Software
The seismic analysis on buildings frame is done by STAAD Pro. (V8i software), It is one of the most popular structural engineering software products for 3D model generation, analysis and multi-material design. It has a sensitive, user-friendly GUI, visualization tools, powerful analysis and design facilities and seamless integration to several other modeling and design software products.
For static or dynamic analysis of bridges, containment structures, embedded structures (tunnels and culverts), pipe racks, steel, concrete, aluminum or timber buildings, transmission towers, stadiums or any other simple or complex structure, STAAD Pro., has been the choice of design professionals around the world for their specific analysis needs.
B. Steps For Comparison
Comparisons of results in terms of bending moments, displacements, shear force, axial force, drift. Following steps are adopted in this study:
C. Modelling &Analysis Of Building Frames
Modeling and analysis of building frames are carried out as per following details-
Modelling
STAAD Pro. Software is used in modeling of building frames. STAAD stands for Structural analysis and design Program and it is general purpose software for performing the analysis and design of a wide variety of structures. The basic activities which are to be carried out to achieve this goal:
A. Conclusions Analysis of structural frame for earthquake forces is a common problem formulation now a day’s due to presence of several software tools and programs. Reinforced concrete structural frames are common form of constructions resting on plains and sloping ground in India. There structures were subjected to different types of forces during their lifetime, such forces like dead load, live loads and dynamic forces like the wind and earthquake load. Results from seismic evaluation performed on six RC buildings with six different ground slopes (00, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300) were carried out by using static method. The displacement of the top storey and the footing reaction, axial force, shear and moment action carried in columns and beams have been followed to analyze the influence of inclined ground on structural performance of building frame. The static analysis was done with the help of STAAD Pro. Software using the seismic parameters as per the IS: 1893- 2002 for the zone (IV) and the post processing result were obtained. 1) The development of bending moments in Step back buildings is higher than that in the Step back set back buildings. Hence, Step back Set back buildings are found to be less vulnerable than Step back building against ground sloping. 2) It is observed that extreme left column at ground level, which are short in height, were affected most. 3) Although, the Setback buildings on plain ground attract less action forces as compared to Step back Set back buildings, overall economic cost involved in leveling the sloping ground and other related issues needs to be studied in detail. 4) Bending moment in regular structure will be constant but in irregular structure where length of column changes according to slope then bending moment will vary respectively i.e., as the length increases bending moment will increase. 5) Shear force of Model 1 in all regular columns vary according to load distribution but irregular structure shear force decreases as increase in slope. 6) Deflection is higher on the lower portion of the structure due to higher bending moments on the lower portion (i.e., Longer Column Section). 7) Maximum storey displacement for M-5 obtained from equivalent static analysis decreased for soft clay (SC), dense sand (DS), hard clay (HC) and rock (RCK) with respect to model M1. Thus as increase in the stiffness of soil storey displacement reduces. B. Future Scope Research work can be carried out in this specific study area and it can help in designing the high rise structures in hilly terrain considering, the various aspects with different soil spectrum, different seismic zones and varying angle of slope.
[1] Montgomery CJ. “Influence of seismic effects on seismic design”, CanadSian Journal of Civil Engineering 1981; 8: pp31-43. [2] IS 875(1987), Indian Standard Code of practice for Design loads for buildings andstructures, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [3] Wilson, E.L., Eeri, M. and Habibullah, A. “Static and Dynamic Analysis of Multi Story Building Including P-Delta Effects”, Earthquake spectra, 3, 2 (1987). [4] Paul, D.K. “Simplified seismic analysis of framed buildings on hill slopes Bulletin of Indian Society of earthquake technology, Vol. 30, No.4, paper 335,Dec 1993, pp 113-124. [5] Paul, D.K. and Kumar, S. (1997) Stability Analysis of Slope with Building Loads.Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 16, pp395-405. [6] Kumar, S., and Paul, D.K. (1998). A Simplified Method for Elastic Seismic Analysis of Hill Buildings.Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2 :( 2), 241-266. [7] Satish Kumar and Paul. D.K., “Hill buildings configuration from seismic consideration”, Journal of structural Engg. Vol. 26, No.3, October 1999, pp. 179-185. [8] Government of Bureau of Indian Standards: IS-875, part 1 (1987), Dead Loads on Buildings and Structures, New Delhi, India. [9] Government of Bureau of Indian Standards: IS-875, part 2 (1987), Live Loads on Buildings and Structures, NewDelhi, India. [10] Tagel-Din Hatem, Kimiro Meguro., Applied Element Method for simulation of nonlinear materials: Theory and application for RC structures, Structural Eng. /Earthquake Eng., JSCE, Vol. 17, No.2, 2000.
Copyright © 2022 Abhishek Kumar Paroha, Deepak Kumar Bandewar. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET45471
Publish Date : 2022-07-09
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here